Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:33:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:33:22 -0400 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:56772 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 23:33:22 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200209280338.HAA02810@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection To: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller) Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 07:38:09 +0400 (MSD) Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20020927.195507.87349906.davem@redhat.com> from "David S. Miller" at Sep 27, 2 07:55:07 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1007 Lines: 25 Hello! > suggest applies both to current code and code after Yoshi's change. This is wrong, unfortunately. The elimination of ipv6_get_saddr() was trivial before this patch (because of independance of preferred source on real destination, only on scope), the corresponding fix was withdrawn from 2.4 only for sake of this feature, pending as a well-known patch. Now I see retransmission of practicllay the same patch, which was deferred for improvement that time. Citing myself two years younger: > The first priority task is to eliminate address selection function. > > Without this odd feature it was easy and, in fact, address selection > patches forced me to withdraw the solution from kernel, because > it makes these hacks much more difficult. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/