Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:40:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:40:26 -0400 Received: from sex.inr.ac.ru ([193.233.7.165]:62916 "HELO sex.inr.ac.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 00:39:46 -0400 From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Message-Id: <200209280444.IAA02959@sex.inr.ac.ru> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Improvement of Source Address Selection To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org (YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=) Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:44:29 +0400 (MSD) Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, usagi@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20020928.133019.38287529.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> from "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?=" at Sep 28, 2 01:30:19 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 20 Hello! > we need per socket preference. What kind of? Some matching rules loaded to socket by user? Anyway, rules established by a particular client should be separate, it is just a generalization of bind()/IP{V6}_PKTINFO. I am not sure that it is really interesting though. Just now I cannot imagine what user can invent which is not covered by system-wide rules, bind() and IP{V6}_PKTINFO. Well, if you think more hairy scheme is interesting, feel free to implement this. Alexey - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/