Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 23:12:25 +0000 (GMT)
From: EUNBONG SONG <eunb.song@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: Re: MIPS: Test reault for  enable interrupts before WAIT
 instruction patch
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "david.daney@cavium.com" <david.daney@cavium.com>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
        "jogo@openwrt.org" <jogo@openwrt.org>,
        "ralf@linux-mips.org" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
        "manuel.lauss@gmail.com" <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Reply-to: eunb.song@samsung.com
MIME-version: 1.0
Msgkey: 20130507230831915@eunb.song
Content-type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr
MIME-version: 1.0
Message-id: <28076857.501501367968343732.JavaMail.weblogic@epv6ml01>
DLP-Filter: Pass
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 525
Lines: 16


>> 
>> Hello. I  tested with two patches.
>> The first one is thomas gleixner's patch. The patch is as follow.
>> This patch works well without any problem.

>You don't need them both.  When we fix it, it will be one or the other,
>not both.

Hello. David.
Maybe i didn't write clearly for test result. I meant i applied only one patche for each test.

Thanks. 

????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?