Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753815Ab3EGX6w (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 19:58:52 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:37733 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751981Ab3EGX6v (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 19:58:51 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: dirk.brandewie@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Intel pstate driver update Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 02:07:15 +0200 Message-ID: <4686510.A1KmKYg1tS@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.9.0+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1367940030-19311-1-git-send-email-dirk.j.brandewie@gmail.com> References: <1367940030-19311-1-git-send-email-dirk.j.brandewie@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1749 Lines: 47 On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 08:20:24 AM dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote: > From: dirk > > Collection of updates for cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > > Patches 1-3 are bugfixes and marked for stable > > Patches 4-6 are code cleanup with no functional changes. > > > Dirk Brandewie (6): > cpufreq/intel_pstate: remove idle time and duration from sample and > calculations > cpufreq/intel_pstate: use lowest requested max performance > cpufreq/intel_pstate: fix ffmpeg regression > cpufreq/intel_pstate: Remove idle mode PID > cpufreq/intel_pstate: Remove unused code > cpufreq/intel_pstate: remove #ifdef MODULE compile fence > > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 122 +++++++---------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-) All queued up for a post-3.10-rc1 push as 3.10 material, but I have a couple of comments. First, the patches didn't apply for me cleanly. I needed to fix up one of them manually to make it apply and patch [5/6] didn't appear to be necessary at all (it made changes that had been made previously). Please check the bleeding-edge branch of my tree to see if the code is what you wanted and let me know (either way). Second, can you please CC your cpufreq submissions to linux-pm@vger.kernel.org? That will allow me to use Patchwork for managing them, which is much more convenient than plain email. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/