Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756260Ab3EHBeJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 21:34:09 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:16977 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752715Ab3EHBeH (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 21:34:07 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,631,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="299164207" Message-ID: <5189AB83.6060503@intel.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 09:33:55 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Preeti U Murthy CC: Paul Turner , Michael Wang , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Borislav Petkov , Namhyung Kim , Mike Galbraith , Morten Rasmussen , Vincent Guittot , Viresh Kumar , LKML , Mel Gorman , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] sched: consider runnable load average in effective_load References: <1367804711-30308-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1367804711-30308-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <518724D1.9040006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51874229.8050202@intel.com> <5187609C.5050209@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <518763B0.30200@intel.com> <51876AFE.80906@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51877970.8010303@intel.com> <51877EF8.20504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51889498.8090409@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <51889498.8090409@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 888 Lines: 22 On 05/07/2013 01:43 PM, Alex Shi wrote: >> > This also brings forth another question,should we modify wake_affine() >> > to pass the runnable load average of the waking up task to effective_load(). >> > >> > What do you think? > I am not Paul. :) > > The acceptable patch of pgbench attached. In fact, since effective_load is mixed > with direct load and tg's runnable load. the patch looks no much sense. > So, I am going to agree to drop it if there is no performance benefit on my benchmarks. This has a bad results on hackbench on 4 socket NHM/SNB machine, and has bad result oltp on NHM EX. machine. So, drop it. -- Thanks Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/