Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754411Ab3EHLcV (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 07:32:21 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:44296 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249Ab3EHLcU (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 07:32:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 13:32:10 +0200 From: Fabio Baltieri To: Lee Jones Cc: Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Ola Lilja Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ASoC: ux500: Update tx tdm slots configuration Message-ID: <20130508113210.GA29130@balto.lan> References: <1367997261-32048-1-git-send-email-fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> <1367997261-32048-5-git-send-email-fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> <20130508110149.GF7478@sirena.org.uk> <20130508111110.GD3459@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130508111110.GD3459@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: Linux balto 3.9.0-rc8-00030-g4cbbd1d x86_64 GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1382 Lines: 31 On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 08 May 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:14:19AM +0200, Fabio Baltieri wrote: > > > Update ab8500-codec and mop500_ab8500 tx slot configuration to reflect > > > the actual one used by STE. Also update a wrong comment in the process. > > > > This seems wrong, the individual chip drivers should just be doing > > whatever they're being told by the machine driver. Sounds like there's > > two fixes needed here - one is to change the TDM API so that the chip > > drivers are just implementing configuration supplied by the machine > > driver and the other is to change the configuration being done to > > whatever is desired. > > Do you mean that the original implementation is incorrect, or that > this patch is doing the wrong thing? I think this patch is a bugfix > rather than a opportunity to refactor the driver. That's correct, the idea for this whole series was just to fix the existing codebase so that it can be enabled and used for regression testing, rather than mixing up bug fixes and code cleanups. Fabio -- Fabio Baltieri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/