Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 05:24:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 05:24:52 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:11259 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 05:24:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Does kernel use system stdarg.h? From: Alan Cox To: Russell King Cc: Oliver Xymoron , Daniel Jacobowitz , Denis Vlasenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020928091530.B32639@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20020927140543.GA5613@nevyn.them.org> <20020927214721.GK21969@waste.org> <20020928091530.B32639@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 28 Sep 2002 10:34:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1033205675.17717.15.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 607 Lines: 14 On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 09:15, Russell King wrote: > It certainly looks like it. gcc 3.0.3 appears to ignore > "-iwithprefix include", where as gcc 2.95.x, 2.96, 3.1 and 3.2 all > work as expected. Thats ok. For x86 at least using 3.0.x isnt wise (it occasionally spills data below the stack pointer which means an IRQ at the wrong moment has dire consequences) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/