Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755483Ab3EHNVb (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 09:21:31 -0400 Received: from mail-a03.ithnet.com ([217.64.83.98]:42443 "HELO ithnet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754935Ab3EHNVa (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 09:21:30 -0400 X-Sender-Authentication: SMTP AUTH verified Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:21:25 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: acpi_cpufreq on Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz problem (3.[4-9].X) Message-Id: <20130508152125.f48b7b55.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2031 Lines: 55 Hello all, I see some kind of bug with acpi_cpufreq on Intels Q6600 cpus. If you load the module you see this in proc: processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz stepping : 11 cpu MHz : 600.000 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm lahf_lm dtherm tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority bogomips : 4800.22 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: (repeated for other cores) As you can see cpu MHz shows 600. Now take a look at cpufreq-info output and see: hardware limits: 600 MHz - 900 MHz Obviously this is wrong, I don't know what the minimum should be, but the max should be 2.40 GHz. If you stress the cpu you will notice MHz go up to 900, but that's it. I have several such boxes, and all act the same with all kernels I tried so far (3.4.X, 3.8.X, 3.9.X). If you unload acpi_cpufreq you see the correct values. To me seems to be no display problem. The box "feels" slower when the module is loaded. With a cpu type Q9300 btw everything works as expected. If there are ideas or patches to test how to remove this problem, feel free to mail/cc me. I can check out whatever looks promising. -- Regards, Stephan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/