Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:13:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:13:31 -0400 Received: from pD9E23260.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.226.50.96]:49288 "EHLO hawkeye.luckynet.adm") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 10:13:31 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:19:24 -0600 (MDT) From: Thunder from the hill X-X-Sender: thunder@hawkeye.luckynet.adm To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Thunder from the hill , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rik van Riel , Tomas Szepe , Zach Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH][2.5] Single linked headed lists for Linux, v3 In-Reply-To: <20020928151006.A911@infradead.org> Message-ID: X-Location: Dorndorf/Steudnitz; Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 694 Lines: 18 Hi, On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > twice the size of each entry is a big enough difference. No need to > add ugly code as second criteria. We just have to add one little ugliness in order to generate even more useful code. As to that, I do definitely disagree with inlining these functions. (There are really lots of functions where inlining actually makes an awful lot of sense, but this one isn't amongst them.) Thunder - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/