From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
        Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
        Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: exynos: Select PINCTRL_EXYNOS for exynos5
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 11:45:10 +0200
Message-id: <1614776.P66h1VoFPp@amdc1227>
Organization: Samsung Poland R&D Center
User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.3-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; )
In-reply-to: <CAOesGMi=K4iJKjSk3RoynhiCMPPT98v5jADnqZ__TwX_YLw65Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1368034349-15091-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
 <CAD=FV=X2n+zHZ3frorwW7L1yybnWWK1=-rWMQJQFus3eNiFFeQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOesGMi=K4iJKjSk3RoynhiCMPPT98v5jADnqZ__TwX_YLw65Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2444
Lines: 62

Hi Doug, Olof,

On Wednesday 08 of May 2013 12:33:34 Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> 
wrote:
> > Olof,
> > 
> > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> >> Seems like this should be selected by the SoC (ARCH_EXYNOS5) instead
> >> of the board. Actually, I'm not sure we need the board Kconfig entry
> >> long-term; all boards will be dt-only.
> > 
> > Good point.  Hopefully someone at Samsung can work on removing the
> > board itself?  If you'd like me to take this on then let me know and I
> > can put it on my list.
> 
> Nothing stops you from doing that on your own. I tend to push back
> onto the maintainers to get them engaged in their own housekeeping,
> but anyone is free to :)
> 
> > I'm happy to resubmit my patch under ARCH_EXYNOS5.  I'll move the
> > exynos4 one at the same time.
> 
> Great.
> 
> > I'm going to make the assumption that PINCTRL_EXYNOS and
> > PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 can happily coexist.  Certainly I've got both
> > defined in my tree right now and nothing blows up.  I haven't tested
> > on 5440 but things ought to be handled by "compatible" checks, right?
> 
> Yes, if they can't coexist then that's a bug.
> 
> > I'll also assume that eventually someone will move PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440
> > into PINCTRL_EXYNOS.  If PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440 won't eventually move
> > under PINCTRL_EXYNOS then it makes less sense to define PINCTRL_EXYNOS
> > for all exynos parts.
> 
> Yeah, it should -- this is just in transition since 5440 was first out
> of the gate with pinctrl.

AFAIK, Exynos5440 contains a completely different pin controller block, which 
is not compatible with pinctrl-samsung driver, so I don't see any point of 
moving it under PINCTRL_EXYNOS, which is currently used for Exynos 4210, 4x12 
and 5250, but will be also extended with driver data for S5PV210 as well.

I'd say that CPU_EXYNOS4210, SOC_EXYNOS4212, SOC_EXYNOS4412 and SOC_EXYNOS5250 
should select PINCTRL_EXYNOS and SOC_EXYNOS5440 should be left as is, 
selecting PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440.

Best regards,
-- 
Tomasz Figa
Samsung Poland R&D Center
SW Solution Development, Kernel and System Framework

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/