Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753361Ab3EITsp (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2013 15:48:45 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:12588 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752884Ab3EITsm (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2013 15:48:42 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,642,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="45847438" Message-ID: <518BFD99.2010208@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 12:48:41 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Hogan CC: Mike Turquette , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Saravana Kannan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate References: <1366388904-13903-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> <518AE16D.5060501@codeaurora.org> <518B663D.60806@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <518B663D.60806@imgtec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1341 Lines: 30 On 05/09/13 02:02, James Hogan wrote: > On 09/05/13 00:36, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 04/19/13 09:28, James Hogan wrote: >>> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent >>> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate >>> to that requested. It can be controlled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX flag >>> so that it doesn't happen unless explicitly allowed. >>> >>> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to >>> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to >>> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in >>> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation. >> Which tree is this based on? I get failures with git am on patch 2. >> > It was based on v3.9-rc4. > Thanks. Would it be possible for you to update to Mike's for-next branch? I've done the rebase myself for now and it seems to work well enough. I'll need to add the set_rate_and_parent() op on top. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/