Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753703Ab3EIUrG (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2013 16:47:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26978 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752279Ab3EIUrD (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2013 16:47:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 16:47:01 -0400 From: Mike Snitzer To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Joe Thornber , device-mapper development , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dm-cache not writing out cache metadata at reboot? Message-ID: <20130509204701.GA2383@redhat.com> References: <20130508214845.GA7729@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130508220526.GA24132@redhat.com> <20130509203616.GA5713@blackbox.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130509203616.GA5713@blackbox.djwong.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2283 Lines: 47 On Thu, May 09 2013 at 4:36pm -0400, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:05:26PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Wed, May 08 2013 at 5:48pm -0400, > > Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > So I've been watching the hit/miss counters in dmcache and I've noticed a > > > couple of things that look like errors to me: > > > > > > First, I noticed that if I reboot the system, neither cache_postsuspend nor > > > cache_dtr get called. This might simply be expected behavior, but it means > > > that the in-memory superblock structure doesn't get written out to disk upon > > > reboot. Just to be sure, I put a printk into __commit_transaction. It prints > > > out for 'dmsetup info' and 'dmsetup remove' but nothing at reboot. > > > > We don't have reboot notifiers that auto-magically tear down an > > artbitrary DM stack. Typically the device shutdown includes unmounting > > filesystems, stopping LVM (which tears down DM devices, etc). > > > > So given that we don't have any userspace LVM2 support for dm-cache yet > > I'm not surprised by this. In fact it is expected. > > > > > Second, cache_status calls dm_cache_commit, which writes out a superblock to > > > the metadata device. However, there's no call to save_stats to copy the > > > current values of the counters out to the disk's copy prior to calling > > > dm_cache_commit. Therefore, we seem to be writing out stale copies of > > > superblock fields. > > > > > > The second one seems fixable with the attached patch > > > > I'll defer to Joe on this but I think sync_metadata() is pretty heavy to > > be doing every 'dmsetup info'. BTW, with just dm_cache_commit() the > > superblock fields aren't stale; only the on-disk hints are. > > Hrmm, how about this: dmsetup info will call save_stats so that the superblock > gets written with the freshest hit/miss counts, and I'll create a new dmsetup > message command that actually flushes everything out? That sounds better. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/