Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:14:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:14:11 -0400 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]:54673 "EHLO mailout02.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Sep 2002 20:14:11 -0400 X-Face: >Q)4Pn.JVfRz{G(G_eIkykbZGG\)2mk8:5a"{^Mk07iC#F.t2L7h|]{*cFg$GEPDdun~+UTjG(^4z<_Ksw%L-\w0xDmUR~ Date: 29 Sep 2002 02:19:44 +0200 Message-ID: <871y7dabq7.fsf@student.uni-tuebingen.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.5 (broccoli) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 745 Lines: 17 Hi, a patch by Alexander Viro: http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/diffs/fs/partitions/osf.c@1.4 changed the naming scheme of OSF partitions: empty partitions are now skipped, whereas previously the partition number would always correspond directly to the number in the partition table. E. g, if you have partition a and d, you end up with hda1 and hda2 instead of hda1 and hda4. I wonder whether that is intended? Is there any problem with non-continguous partition numbers in 2.5? -- Falk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/