Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752393Ab3ELEjP (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 May 2013 00:39:15 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:51699 "EHLO mail-la0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138Ab3ELEjM (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 May 2013 00:39:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20130510045049.GU24635@dastard> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 21:39:10 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what? From: Daniel Phillips To: james northrup Cc: Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tux3@tux3.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 869 Lines: 21 On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 11:35 AM, james northrup wrote: > also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds > that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific > misconduct, not error Could you please be specific about the meaning you intend? Because innuendo is less than useful in this forum. If you mean to say that our posted results might not be independently verifiable then I invite you to run the tests as described (including removing fsync) yourself. If you require any assistance from us in doing that, we will be pleased to provide it. Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/