Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754751Ab3ELRVm (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 May 2013 13:21:42 -0400 Received: from e37.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.158]:58514 "EHLO e37.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754568Ab3ELRVl (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 May 2013 13:21:41 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 10:21:35 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Mork Cc: Dipankar Sarma , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org Subject: Re: [v3.10-rc1] WARNING: at kernel/rcutree.c:502 Message-ID: <20130512172135.GJ3648@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <87ip2opntp.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <20130512113905.GH3648@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87li7kp50r.fsf@nemi.mork.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87li7kp50r.fsf@nemi.mork.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13051217-7408-0000-0000-00001017F0E2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1340 Lines: 35 On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 05:55:00PM +0200, Bj?rn Mork wrote: > "Paul E. McKenney" writes: > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:08:50AM +0200, Bj?rn Mork wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> got the splat below when running powertop on plain v3.10-rc1 > >> (i.e. without my previously mentioned revert patch or any other extra > >> patches). Config attached. > > > > OK, it looks like you have context-tracking enabled, so you might be > > hitting a bug that Steven Rostedt found a few days ago. Could you > > please try out his fix below? > > Thanks for the quick reply, but I'm afraid that patch had no effect on > the warning I got. It's still there. Other than wondering whether powertop has issues similar to the bug Steven Rostedt located, I must confess myself clueless. Here are some diagnostics I can suggest: 1. Run in 32-bit mode. This disables some of the new adaptive-ticks functionality, so might give a probabilistic indication of where the bug lies. 2. The standard fallback of bisection. Would you be willing to do either of these? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/