Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:40:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:40:59 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:13572 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:40:58 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:46:20 +0100 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" To: linux-kernel mailing list Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 Message-ID: <20020929134620.GD2153@gallifrey> References: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Chocolate: 70 percent or better cocoa solids preferably X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18 (i686) X-Uptime: 14:44:25 up 1 day, 18:41, 1 user, load average: 2.08, 2.02, 2.01 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 20 In my case I gave 2.5.x an attempt at building on my x86 box a few weeks ago but had to give up because of the lack of LVM which I rely on. I fancy having a go on some of my non-x86 boxen; does anyone know the state of 2.5.x for non-x86? (Does anyone other than some marketing bods really care if it is 2.6 or 3.0 - I definitly don't). Dave ---------------- Have a happy GNU millennium! ---------------------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux on Alpha,68K| Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | MIPS,x86,ARM, SPARC and HP-PA | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/