Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262479AbSI2Nw2>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:52:28 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262480AbSI2Nw2>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:52:28 -0400
Received: from dial249.pm3abing3.abingdonpm.naxs.com ([216.98.75.249]:17282
	"EHLO ani.animx.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S262479AbSI2Nw1>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:52:27 -0400
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:06:53 -0400
From: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0
Message-ID: <20020929100653.B31787@animx.eu.org>
References: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209290858170.22404-100000@innerfire.net> <20020929134620.GD2153@gallifrey>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
In-Reply-To: <20020929134620.GD2153@gallifrey>; from Dr. David Alan Gilbert on Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:46:20PM +0100
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 724
Lines: 18

> In my case I gave 2.5.x an attempt at building on my x86 box a few weeks
> ago but had to give up because of the lack of LVM which I rely on.
> 
> I fancy having a go on some of my non-x86 boxen; does anyone know the
> state of 2.5.x for non-x86?
> 
> (Does anyone other than some marketing bods really care if it is 2.6 or
> 3.0 - I definitly don't).

I thought 2.4 should be 3.0 since 1.3 went to 2.0 =)

-- 
 Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/