Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755288Ab3EMQJ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2013 12:09:58 -0400 Received: from tx2ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com ([65.55.88.12]:9509 "EHLO tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755163Ab3EMQJz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2013 12:09:55 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.199.60.83;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:xsj-gw1;RD:unknown-60-83.xilinx.com;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -1 X-BigFish: VPS-1(zz98dIc89bh1432Izz1f42h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh95h668h839h93fhd24hf0ah119dh1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h14ddh1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh906i1155h) Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:09:47 -0700 From: =?utf-8?B?U8O2cmVu?= Brinkmann To: Mark Brown CC: Mike Turquette , , Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] clk: Introduce userspace clock driver References: <1368207091-32538-1-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <1368207091-32538-2-git-send-email-soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> <20130510212422.GY3200@sirena.org.uk> <7e18bed3-ae6b-4aa0-bf23-b6c61ba8b85b@CO9EHSMHS030.ehs.local> <20130512143344.GC3200@sirena.org.uk> <9e55c552-ce34-4663-9a57-bf2c626d7d58@TX2EHSMHS008.ehs.local> <20130513052135.GD6836@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130513052135.GD6836@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-RCIS-Action: ALLOW Message-ID: <0bf5a185-86f7-4a93-a90f-42caefb06a1d@TX2EHSMHS009.ehs.local> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginatorOrg: xilinx.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1695 Lines: 35 On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:21:35AM +0400, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:05:04PM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 06:33:44PM +0400, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > No, there's no confusion here - the clocks that are being exposed to > > > userspace are the clocks which enter the FPGA. The driver or whatever > > > that understands the FPGA can do what is needed to control them, > > > including routing them on to subdevices it instantiates or exposing them > > > to userspace. > > > Such a driver does not exist in general. > > For some IP cores, Linux drivers do exist and then > > they are supposed to directly use the CCF, IMHO, no need to expose > > things to userspace in that case. > > I'm trying to cover cases, in which there is no driver available/needed for > > the FPGA design, other than some simple clock controls. > > You're not understanding the point here. If you've got a > reprogrammmable FPGA you at least need some way to get the FPGA image in > there. This driver is presumably responsible for instantiating whatever > is needed to control what is on the FPGA, that could include punting the > clocks to userspace if that's sane. Well, that driver actually exists. But that just programs a bitstream you give it to program. It does not know anything about the design it programs and cannot make any kind of decision whether the clocks should be userspace controlled or not. Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/