Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:13:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:13:02 -0400 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:41107 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 11:13:02 -0400 Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 From: "Trever L. Adams" To: james Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> References: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1033312735.1326.3.camel@aurora.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.1 (Preview Release) Date: 29 Sep 2002 11:18:55 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 979 Lines: 20 On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 02:14, james wrote: > How many people are sitting on the sidelines waiting for guarantee that ide is > not going to blow up on our filesystems and take our data with it. Guarantee > that ide is working and not dangerous to our data, then I bet a lot more > people will come back and bang on 2.5. I can tell you right now that I am one of these. I usually would have been involved in testing it for my situations/needs several months ago, but I have been very leary of the IDE and block changes. I have one machine (a router) that I could test it on if I knew that the dangers of IDE and block were at least low and that the IPv4 and associated networking connection tracking and NAT stuff worked. Trever - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/