Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:35:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:35:19 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:49671 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:35:19 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 10:42:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: james cc: Ingo Molnar , Jeff Garzik , Larry Kessler , Alan Cox , linux-kernel mailing list , "Andrew V. Savochkin" , Rusty Russell , Richard J Moore Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 In-Reply-To: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 775 Lines: 21 On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, james wrote: > > How many people are sitting on the sidelines waiting for guarantee that ide is > not going to blow up on our filesystems and take our data with it. Guarantee > that ide is working and not dangerous to our data, then I bet a lot more > people will come back and bang on 2.5. How the hell can I _guarantee_ anything like that? I can say that the IDE code is the same code that is in 2.4.x, so if you're comfortable with 2.4.x wrt IDE, then you should be comfy with 2.5.x too. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/