Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:55:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:55:27 -0400 Received: from pa90.banino.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.76.211.90]:56846 "EHLO alf.amelek.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:55:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] fix parport_serial / serial link order (for 2.4.20-pre8) In-Reply-To: To: Zwane Mwaikambo Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:00:41 +0200 (CEST) CC: Marek Michalkiewicz , twaugh@redhat.com, serial24@macrolink.com, Linux Kernel X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL95 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: From: Marek Michalkiewicz Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 998 Lines: 25 > Piece-Of-Shh... ;) Hmm, works fine here so far, though I only have tested the parallel port in polling mode (that's how it is set up by default). > 00:0e.0 Communication controller: NetMos Technology 222N-2 I/O Card (2S+1P) (rev 01) Mine is "ST Lab PCI 2S1P IO Controller Card" - which has no serial configuration EEPROM (there is an empty place for it on the PCB). The 9710:9835 numbers are the generic defaults hardwired in the NM9835 chip, not specific to any board type like "222N-2". > I have been using this setup for a while now. I haven't heard anything from the kernel people yet - any chances of getting these changes into the official 2.4.x source? I can make a second patch (NetMos support) after the first one is accepted... Marek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/