Message-ID: <5192217D.5030706@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 19:35:25 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120912 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
        morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
        wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch v6 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg
References: <1368199049-2798-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1368199049-2798-9-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <20130514083148.GD15942@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130514083148.GD15942@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 916
Lines: 24

On 05/14/2013 04:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:17:29PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> > blocked_load_avg sometime is too heavy and far bigger than runnable load
>> > avg. that make balance make wrong decision. So better don't consider it.
> Would you happen to have an example around that illustrates this? 

Sorry, No.
> 
> Also, you've just changed the cgroup balancing -- did you run any tests on that?
> 

I tested all benchmarks on cover letter maintained, aim7, kbuild etc.
with autogroup enabled. There is no clear performance change.
But since the machine just run benchmark without anyother load, that
doesn't enough.

-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/