Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758340Ab3ENQ5g (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 12:57:36 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:53823 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752684Ab3ENQ5e (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 12:57:34 -0400 Message-ID: <51926CF6.1050706@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 00:57:26 +0800 From: Liu Jiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yinghai Lu CC: Gu Zheng , Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Toshi Kani , Myron Stowe , Yijing Wang , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "David S. Miller" , David Airlie , Neela Syam Kolli , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-Scsi , Jiang Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, part 1 3/9] PCI: Convert alloc_pci_dev(void) to pci_alloc_dev(bus) instead References: <1368461313-4371-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1368461313-4371-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <5191F53E.4000305@cn.fujitsu.com> <51925136.5050302@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1168 Lines: 32 On Tue 14 May 2013 11:10:33 PM CST, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Liu Jiang wrote: >> On 05/14/2013 04:26 PM, Gu Zheng wrote: >> I suggest to use pci_release_dev() instead because it also needs to >> release OF related resources. >> I will update it in next version. >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> index bc075a3..2ac6338 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c >> @@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ static struct pci_dev *pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus >> *bus >> pci_set_of_node(dev); >> >> if (pci_setup_device(dev)) { >> - kfree(dev); >> + pci_release_dev(&dev->dev); >> return NULL; > > no, should move pci_set_of_node calling into pci_setup_device. > > Yinghai I'm not sure whether we should call pci_set_of_node() for SR-IOV devices too, any suggestions here? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/