Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758655Ab3ENWEv (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 18:04:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62562 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758432Ab3ENWEq (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 May 2013 18:04:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 15:04:40 -0700 From: Zach Brown To: Dave Chinner Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v0 0/4] sys_copy_range() rough draft Message-ID: <20130514220440.GN16385@lenny.home.zabbo.net> References: <1368566126-17610-1-git-send-email-zab@redhat.com> <20130514214251.GK29466@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130514214251.GK29466@dastard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1551 Lines: 30 On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:42:51AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 02:15:22PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > > I'm going to keep hacking away at this. My next step is to get ext4 > > supporting .copy_range, probably with a quick hack to copy the > > contents of bios. Hopefully that'll give enough time to also integrate > > review feedback. > > Wouldn't the easiest "support all filesystems" hack just be to add > a destination offset parameter to do_splice_direct() and call that > when the filesystem doesn't supply a ->copy_range method? i.e. use > the mechanisms we already have for copying from one file to another > via the page cache as efficiently as possible? Probably; and this in-kernel buffered fallback is particularly desirable for nfsd when the exported fs doesn't provide .copy_range. Having nfsd service the COPY op is still a significant win over having the client move the data backand forth over the wire. But in that quote above I was talking about implementing .copy_range in ext4 as though it could use XCOPY today. I'd like to get a feel for how bad it's going to be to juggle the bio XCOPY IO with unwritten extent conversion, RMW with overlapping existing blocks, i_size advancing, etc. (It's so much like O_DIRECT that I'm already crying a little.) - z -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/