Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:28:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:28:02 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:22232 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:27:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:33:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Adrian Bunk X-X-Sender: bunk@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de To: Alan Cox cc: Christoph Hellwig , Marcelo Tosatti , Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix drm ioctl ABI default In-Reply-To: <1033153674.16726.10.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 925 Lines: 32 On 27 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > With all the vendors now shipping 4.2 this seems a bad thing to default > to the 4,1 interface - especially as the 4.1 server is >... Debian 3.0 ships with 4.1 and my personal estimation is that the next release of Debian will be in 2004 (I'm happy if it will be earlier...). > o Has security holes that are fixed in 4.2.1 only The Debian maintainer of XFree86 claims that at least the Xlib problem doesn't affect 4.1 [1]. > Alan cu Adrian [1] http://people.debian.org/~branden/ -- You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/