Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932739Ab3EOM4V (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 08:56:21 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:54574 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932490Ab3EOM4S (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2013 08:56:18 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:55:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-18-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Michal Simek , Linus Walleij , Jamie Iles , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Christian Daudt , Viresh Kumar , David Brown , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Shawn Guo , Barry Song , Tony Prisk , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305151455.12603.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:1M8pVtCyS1Ttsim3v2yApgqauRFiFMPGn6QpZbXEeLk xt61n4EKRSdRbGaRrbQfjUuJWOG1MwmBYv/g+p2Lw9uy7ZqWkp LIIT+fCCz+ZkYI2dmjsAid573wq6mtEKO1o+Ez4emcWnGxY1rC /VcHMKpnr2mRvMidcud5kH3PwzBSleTJMd8ZYevIjCRx36cXdF znMGKAYO9b5+86IDPTcuQoqONQpik+16Bn6f2NpMJte1U2kFbh 2iAgSm06ID9qIfrdHa4wFKsCqY/Zrh+J2a9Kz7W8jY8LrDq/rV zXpyoB6S7/GEvCpErx2vasaXEBkGGSW5LJfzwKPoRl0Y0c8uTg KweJ9rDrPacpJFPZae+g= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1028 Lines: 23 On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote: > This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to > remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in > the machine descriptions. > > Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of > different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top > of 3.10-rc1. > > The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree > the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc > later on. Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/