Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261803AbSI2Vlf>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:41:35 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261812AbSI2Vlf>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:41:35 -0400
Received: from krusty.dt.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:5636 "EHLO
	mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261803AbSI2Vld>; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:41:33 -0400
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:46:52 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
To: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
       "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0
Message-ID: <20020929214652.GF12928@merlin.emma.line.org>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <gilbertd@treblig.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
References: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209290858170.22404-100000@innerfire.net> <20020929134620.GD2153@gallifrey> <20020929154254.GD1014@suse.de> <20020929162221.GB19948@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020929162221.GB19948@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 997
Lines: 23

On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Dave Jones wrote:

> Joe Thornber sent a patch removing LVM1, but LVM2 has yet to
> make an appearance in 2.5.x patchform afair.  LVM is in one of
> those sneaky positions where they could theoretically cheat
> the feature freeze, as whats in the tree right now is fubar,
> and we need /something/ before going 2.6/3.0.

Is not EVMS ready for the show? Is Linux >=2.6 going to have LVM2 and
EVMS? Or just LVM2? I'm not aware of the current status, but I do recall
having seen EVMS stable announcements (but not sure about 2.5 status).

> It'd be nice to get /something/ in before the feature freeze so
> people can bang on this after halloween when we ramp up stability
> testing instead of waiting until the last minute.

Indeed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/