Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:00:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:00:40 -0400 Received: from adsl-66-141-54-86.dsl.austtx.swbell.net ([66.141.54.86]:15238 "HELO digitalroadkill.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:00:40 -0400 Subject: Re: LVM in 2.5.39 broken. From: GrandMasterLee To: Matthias Andree Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020929220421.GI12928@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <1033318471.2451.17.camel@UberGeek.digitalroadkill.net> <20020929220421.GI12928@merlin.emma.line.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Digitalroadkill.net Message-Id: <1033322607.2447.19.camel@UberGeek.digitalroadkill.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.1.99 (Preview Release) Date: 29 Sep 2002 18:03:27 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 746 Lines: 21 You mean the BK? If so, I'll go get it. :) On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 22:04, Matthias Andree wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, GrandMasterLee wrote: > > > LVM compilation in 2.5.39 seems to be broken. > > LVM1 has not been adjusted to track the API changes in 2.5. Technical as > that may sound: LVM1 is broken in 2.5 and will probably never be fixed, > but replaced by something else. Peek into the 2.6/3.0 tree that's in > progress at this moment to see how things are going. > > -- > Matthias Andree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/