Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:35:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:35:21 -0400 Received: from mx15.sac.fedex.com ([199.81.197.54]:29198 "EHLO mx15.sac.fedex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:35:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:39:28 +0800 (SGT) From: Jeff Chua X-X-Sender: root@boston.corp.fedex.com To: Alan Cox cc: Jens Axboe , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , linux-kernel mailing list , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 In-Reply-To: <1033316509.13001.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09/30/2002 08:40:33 AM, Serialize by Router on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09/30/2002 08:40:38 AM, Serialize complete at 09/30/2002 08:40:38 AM Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 911 Lines: 27 On 29 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 16:42, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Has anyone actually sent patches to Linus removing LVM completely from > > 2.5 and adding the LVM2 device mapper? If I used LVM, I would have done > > exactly that long ago. Linus, what's your oppinion on this? > > I added LVM2 a while ago for my 2.4-ac tree and haven't looked back, its > much nicer code and its clean and easy to understand. I wouldnt > guarantee its bug free but its the kind of code where you can *find* a > bug if one turns up I can't even get past "make apply-patches" with device-mapper.0.96.04 on 2.5.39. Anyone running lvm2 on 2.5.3x ? Thanks, Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/