Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:24:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:24:31 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:7083 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:24:30 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:22:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020929.172254.42500513.davem@redhat.com> To: arjanv@fenrus.demon.nl Cc: perex@suse.cz, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA update [6/10] - 2002/07/20 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1033326744.2419.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1033326744.2419.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 648 Lines: 16 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: 29 Sep 2002 21:12:23 +0200 what is wrong with the PCI DMA API that makes ALSA wants a private interface/implementation ? It makes the layers not have to know what the BUS is, and this can all be deleted when everything goes through a generic struct device and assosciated OPS. I think ALSA is definitely doing the right thing here. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/