Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:41:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:41:10 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:16043 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:41:08 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 17:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020929.173946.33239830.davem@redhat.com> To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 23 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:52:17 +0200 (CEST) net_bh_lock: i have removed it, since it would synchronize to nothing. The old protocol handlers should still run on UP, and on SMP the kernel prints a warning upon use. Alexey, is this approach fine with you? Just kill this crap completely. Old protocol handlers are %100 unsupported in 2.6 I know people are working on fixing up basically every old protocol layer currently in the tree, so this will not be an issue. When a "struct packet_type" is registered in dev_add_pack(), fail if !pt->data which is the indication of "old protocol". Once all the protocols are finished being fixed up, pt->data and this test can die. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/