Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 21:00:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 21:00:22 -0400 Received: from mx13.sac.fedex.com ([199.81.197.53]:31754 "EHLO mx13.sac.fedex.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 20:59:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:03:29 +0800 (SGT) From: Jeff Chua X-X-Sender: root@boston.corp.fedex.com To: Linux Kernel cc: Alan Cox , Jens Axboe , Linus Torvalds , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09/30/2002 09:04:31 AM, Serialize by Router on ENTPM11/FEDEX(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09/30/2002 09:04:33 AM, Serialize complete at 09/30/2002 09:04:33 AM Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 28 On 29 Sep 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 16:42, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Has anyone actually sent patches to Linus removing LVM completely from > > 2.5 and adding the LVM2 device mapper? If I used LVM, I would have done > > exactly that long ago. Linus, what's your oppinion on this? > > I added LVM2 a while ago for my 2.4-ac tree and haven't looked back, its > much nicer code and its clean and easy to understand. I wouldnt > guarantee its bug free but its the kind of code where you can *find* a > bug if one turns up I can't even get past "make apply-patches" with device-mapper.0.96.04 on 2.5.39. Anyone running lvm2 on 2.5.3x ? Thanks, Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/