Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753334Ab3EPMSE (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 08:18:04 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:64076 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752871Ab3EPMSA (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 08:18:00 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Daniel Tang Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv3 3/6] clk: Add TI-Nspire clock drivers Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 14:17:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-18-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Linus Walleij , "fabian@ritter-vogt.de Vogt" , Lionel Debroux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette References: <1368332581-94691-1-git-send-email-dt.tangr@gmail.com> <201305151607.54442.arnd@arndb.de> <15FD6543-D04A-4953-A56A-40B27F0026E4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <15FD6543-D04A-4953-A56A-40B27F0026E4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305161417.28133.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:fQb2A2WJ/o3zw0rPQuSdySV6VpnJEhxv5N9ilpvlUQb 3cTZcLihLt7IIZANZqsAURNMu+5BLtssLl0OFsikiFczPlLrUT OkOwJ+lXsniK7rL4E7RB9ZwWTW6ApZvO82BGxYvrQauo83cgSU rTGiIpPyp6PJ1jtNnDD05Vyz7yVLN5gAjenLHbYf5xyd/hUJJ/ uFAAwzD91bk8IayR9dVuze3fmuuZptuiupEbnqJidqbR8/JYVR BrzhB4lBgVTsKtz043OrKiWUdfR0B0b/VpmAc7AfTSQFbDRbAA ZvLgpDojbRPtNsaqqjFzL8Kc359d74YFpwTH7B2fd66j65ZXl2 2ZscMql/HWNLmeqLGxzY= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1519 Lines: 34 On Thursday 16 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote: > > On 16/05/2013, at 12:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > You are missing a binding in Documentation/devicetree, same as for some of > > the other drivers in this series. > > Should we be adding a vendor prefix to it too? If so, we're not sure whether > to use "ti," or not since this isn't an official port by TI. The binding describes the hardware, it should not matter who does the port. However, any part of the tree that is not actually from TI should have a vendor prefix indicating who made that part. IIRC, the SoC used in there is from TI, so you should use something else for the on-soc components. > > It seems strange to assign the clk_name variable to node->name > > first and then overriding it with the clock-output-names property. > > Is that intentional? If so, please explain it in a comment. > > > > I copied that bit of boilerplate from drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c but > I'm guessing it's to use the node name as the clock name unless there > is a property called "clock-output-names" Ah, I see. It seems you forgot to add the clock maintainer to Cc in the mail. Mike is the one who will have to take you patch anyway, so I assume he will comment on this if you did it wrong. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/