Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754093Ab3EPVQu (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 17:16:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63863 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753215Ab3EPVQs (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 17:16:48 -0400 Message-ID: <51954CBC.7070308@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:16:44 -0400 From: Ric Wheeler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130402 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zach Brown CC: Eric Wong , "Martin K. Petersen" , Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v0 1/4] vfs: add copy_range syscall and vfs entry point References: <1368566126-17610-1-git-send-email-zab@redhat.com> <1368566126-17610-2-git-send-email-zab@redhat.com> <20130515194405.GA28720@dcvr.yhbt.net> <20130515200307.GD318@lenny.home.zabbo.net> In-Reply-To: <20130515200307.GD318@lenny.home.zabbo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1127 Lines: 33 On 05/15/2013 04:03 PM, Zach Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 07:44:05PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: >> Why introduce a new syscall instead of extending sys_splice? > Personally, I think it's ugly to have different operations use the same > syscall just because their arguments match. I agree with Zach - having a system call called "splice" do copy offloads is not intuitive. This is a very reasonable name for something that battled its way through several standards bodies (for NFS and SCSI :)), so we should give it a reasonable name thanks! Ric > > But that preference aside, sure, if the consensus is that we'd rather > use the splice() entry point then I can duck tape the pieces together to > make it work. > >> If the user doesn't need a out offset, then sendfile() should also be >> able to transparently utilize COPY/CLONE_RANGE, too. > Perhaps, yeah. > > - z -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/