Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755136Ab3EPXrY (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 19:47:24 -0400 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:48455 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753541Ab3EPXrW (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 19:47:22 -0400 X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v1.8.9 X-SHieldMailCheckerPolicyVersion: FJ-ISEC-20120718-2 Message-ID: <51956FF6.3070205@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:47:02 +0900 From: HATAYAMA Daisuke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Goyal CC: riel@redhat.com, hughd@google.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lisa.mitchell@hp.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, kumagai-atsushi@mxc.nes.nec.co.jp, ebiederm@xmission.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, walken@google.com, cpw@sgi.com, jingbai.ma@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] vmcore: allocate ELF note segment in the 2nd kernel vmalloc memory References: <20130515090507.28109.28956.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20130515090614.28109.26492.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20130516203236.GG5904@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130516203236.GG5904@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1176 Lines: 37 (2013/05/17 5:32), Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:06:14PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > > [..] > >> +static int __init get_note_number_and_size_elf32(const Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr, >> + int *nr_ptnote, u64 *phdr_sz) >> +{ >> + return process_note_headers_elf32(ehdr_ptr, nr_ptnote, phdr_sz, NULL); >> +} >> + >> +static int __init copy_notes_elf32(const Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr, char *notes_buf) >> +{ >> + return process_note_headers_elf32(ehdr_ptr, NULL, NULL, notes_buf); >> +} >> + > > Please don't do this. We need to create two separate functions doing > two different operations and not just create wrapper around a function > which does two things. > > I know both functions will have similar for loops for going through > the elf notes but it is better then doing function overloading based > on parameters passed. > I see. This part must be fixed in the next version. -- Thanks. HATAYAMA, Daisuke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/