Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 01:51:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 01:51:29 -0400 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59873 "HELO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 01:51:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:06:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: "David S. Miller" Cc: Linus Torvalds , , William Lee Irwin III , , Alexey Kuznetsov , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 In-Reply-To: <20020929.173946.33239830.davem@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 27 On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar > Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 19:52:17 +0200 (CEST) > > net_bh_lock: i have removed it, since it would synchronize to nothing. The > old protocol handlers should still run on UP, and on SMP the kernel prints > a warning upon use. Alexey, is this approach fine with you? > > Just kill this crap completely. Old protocol handlers are %100 > unsupported in 2.6 > > I know people are working on fixing up basically every old protocol > layer currently in the tree, so this will not be an issue. wonderful. I thought it might have helped if we kep those old-protocol callbacks around in the UP kernel still (to help converting stuff) - but if this is being taken care of then great. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/