Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:51:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:51:43 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:2207 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:51:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:56:25 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: Linus Torvalds , james , Ingo Molnar , Jeff Garzik , Larry Kessler , linux-kernel mailing list , "Andrew V. Savochkin" , Rusty Russell , Richard J Moore Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 Message-ID: <20020930075625.GH1014@suse.de> References: <1033323866.13762.1.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033323866.13762.1.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 919 Lines: 25 On Sun, Sep 29 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 18:42, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I can say that the IDE code is the same code that is in 2.4.x, so if > > you're comfortable with 2.4.x wrt IDE, then you should be comfy with > > 2.5.x too. > > *NO* > > The IDE code is the experimental code in 2.4-ac. It is _NOT_ the IDE > code in 2.4 and its a lot less tested. I don't think it has any > corruption bugs but it is most definitely not the base 2.4 code and has > plenty of non corruption bugs (PCMCIA hang, taskfile write hang, irq > blocking performance problems) 2.5 at least does not have the taskfile hang, because I killed taskfile io. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/