Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:56:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:56:23 -0400 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:20913 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:56:22 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9804E1.76C9D4AE@digeo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 01:01:37 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.5.38 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Martin J. Bligh" CC: lkml , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: 2.5.39-mm1 References: <3D976206.B2C6A5B8@digeo.com> <735786955.1033347097@[10.10.2.3]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2002 08:01:39.0186 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B025520:01C26857] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1088 Lines: 29 "Martin J. Bligh" wrote: > > > I must say that based on a small amount of performance testing the > > benefits of the cache warmness thing are disappointing. Maybe 1% if > > you squint. Martin, could you please do a before-and-after on the > > NUMAQ's, double check that it is actually doing the right thing? > > Seems to work just fine: > > 2.5.38-mm1 + my original hot/cold code. > Elapsed: 19.798s User: 191.61s System: 43.322s CPU: 1186.4% > > 2.5.39-mm1 > Elapsed: 19.532s User: 192.25s System: 42.642s CPU: 1203.2% > > And it's a lot more than 1% for me ;-) About 12% of systime > on kernel compile, IIRC. Well that's still a 1% bottom line. But we don't have a comparison which shows the effects of this patch alone. Can you patch -R the five patches and retest sometime? I just get the feeling that it should be doing better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/