Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:23:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:23:41 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:6138 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:23:40 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.3.39 compile errors on Alpha From: Alan Cox To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Jochen Friedrich , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 30 Sep 2002 13:35:40 +0100 Message-Id: <1033389340.16337.14.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 25 On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:08, Adrian Bunk wrote: > this is a known issue, the following patch (already in Linus' BK tree) > fixes it: > > --- linux-2.5.35-VIRGIN/drivers/atm/atmtcp.c 2002-08-24 00:08:21.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.5.35/drivers/atm/atmtcp.c 2002-09-16 21:04:30.000000000 -0700 > @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ > result = -ENOBUFS; > goto done; > } > - new_skb->stamp = xtime; > + do_gettimeofday(&new_skb->stamp); Is this actually safe - suppose the machine has no tsc counter (eg old x86 or indeed new x86 numa, speedstep using, etc). In that case do_gettimeofday doesn't appear to be either IRQ safe or fast enough to use in this way ? Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/