Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:54:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:54:49 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([80.146.160.66]:3491 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:54:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9874E7.70805@colorfullife.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:59:35 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Martin J. Bligh" CC: lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, akpm@digeo.com, tomlins@cam.org, "Kamble, Nitin A" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATH] slab cleanup References: <3D96F559.2070502@colorfullife.com> <732392454.1033343702@[10.10.2.3]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 945 Lines: 26 Martin J. Bligh wrote: >>Could someone test that it works on real SMP? > > > Tested on 16-way NUMA-Q (shows up races quicker than anything ;-)). > Boots, compiles the kernel 5 times OK. That's good enough for me. > No performance regression, in fact was marginally faster (within > experimental error though). > Thanks for the test. NUMA is on my TODO list, after figuring out where/how to drain cpu caches and the free list. I've found one stupid bug with debugging enabled: the new debug code tries to poison NULL pointers, with limited success :-( And one limitation might be important for arch specific code: kmem_cache_create() during mem_init() is not possible anymore. -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/