Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932122Ab3ETTvW (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:22 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:22493 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757989Ab3ETTvU (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:20 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=L+efspv8 c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=iT4cs34EYqoA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=8r7ovOuLwwQA:10 a=l7tcQsvpVlmC4ucDAc0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=jeBq3FmKZ4MA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1369079478.6828.125.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [ 104/136 ] r8169: fix 8168evl frame padding. From: Steven Rostedt To: David Miller Cc: romieu@fr.zoreil.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, stefan.bader@canonical.com, hayeswang@realtek.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, ben@decadent.org.uk Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 15:51:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130520.124521.830734947343814495.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20130518021658.398536101@goodmis.org> <20130518100224.GA20930@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1369078844.6828.124.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130520.124521.830734947343814495.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 34 On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 12:45 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 15:40:44 -0400 > > > On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 12:02 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > >> Steven Rostedt : > >> > 3.6.11.4 stable review patch. > >> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > >> > >> You should postpone it until the fix for a regression it induces when > >> user enable Tx checksumming is merged. > >> > > > > What do you mean? This has already been incorporated into 3.2, 3.4, 3.8, > > and 3.9 stable trees. Or has it just been recently found that this > > introduces a regression? > > > > I can pull this out for this release. > > > > (this was upstream commit: e5195c1f31f399289347e043d6abf3ffa80f0005) > > This patch causes a new regression, which is only fixed in my 'net' > tree at this time. Thanks for the quick response. I'll drop it from 3.6.11.4. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/