Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755359Ab3EURpI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from mailout39.mail01.mtsvc.net ([216.70.64.83]:49714 "EHLO n12.mail01.mtsvc.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754878Ab3EURpG (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:06 -0400 Message-ID: <519BB29D.9010104@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:01 -0400 From: Peter Hurley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wang YanQing CC: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TTY:vt: convert remain take_over_console's users to do_take_over_console References: <20130521051511.GA11435@udknight> <519B7249.2070207@hurleysoftware.com> <20130521144215.GA5302@udknight.homenetwork> <519B976A.3050708@hurleysoftware.com> <20130521161849.GA11322@udknight.homenetwork> <20130521162958.GA1927@udknight> In-Reply-To: <20130521162958.GA1927@udknight> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: 990527 peter@hurleysoftware.com X-MT-INTERNAL-ID: 8fa290c2a27252aacf65dbc4a42f3ce3735fb2a4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1169 Lines: 31 On 05/21/2013 12:29 PM, Wang YanQing wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:18:49AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote: >>> Except now you're spreading the brokenness that is console_lock() >>> over many more source files than the single-use case of >>> do_take_over_console(). >> >>> The actual interface is take_over_console(); the _workaround_ is >>> exposing do_take_over_console() for fbcon to wrap. >> >> This _workaround_ willn't work, take_over_console will hold console_lock internal, >> but do_take_over_console need caller hold console_lock, then we can't rewrite >> do_take_over_console as a wrap base on take_over_console. The workaround I'm referring to is commit 50e244cc793 which exposed do_take_over_console() as an interface to band aid the lock problems. I'm ok with take_over_console() being a lock wrapper around do_take_over_console(), if you are trying to preserve your other changes. Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/