Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:09:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:09:04 -0400 Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:33297 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:09:03 -0400 From: "Albert D. Cahalan" Message-Id: <200209301914.g8UJEIu154087@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] procps 2.0.9 To: akpm@digeo.com (Andrew Morton) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 15:14:17 -0400 (EDT) Cc: acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3D989F25.F6605540@digeo.com> from "Andrew Morton" at Sep 30, 2002 11:59:49 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 23 Andrew Morton writes: > "Albert D. Cahalan" wrote: >> Many of the "fixes" have been in Debian's procps for years. >> >> Debian's code has been fully maintained for years. It is >> available in CVS at SourceForge. Let us know what you think >> of the new "top" program. > > Does it support the /proc/stat cleanups which I have queued, > and the additional /proc/meminfo fields? Today, no. Next week, yes. Maybe by tonight even... That's very recent stuff that you sent to the other fork. BTW, the /proc/meminfo parsing was cleaned up years ago. You didn't see that clean-up because Red Hat fell asleep for a few years. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/