Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754966Ab3EVChV (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 22:37:21 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f51.google.com ([209.85.210.51]:45736 "EHLO mail-da0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754934Ab3EVChS (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 22:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: <519C2F5D.8000809@igel.co.jp> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:37:17 +0900 From: Damian Hobson-Garcia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Damian Hobson-Garcia CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, msalter@redhat.com, linux-c6x-dev@linux-c6x.org, deller@gmx.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dma-mapping: Define dma_{alloc,free}_attrs() for all archs References: <1367290899-10410-1-git-send-email-dhobsong@igel.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <1367290899-10410-1-git-send-email-dhobsong@igel.co.jp> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1493 Lines: 40 Hello, On 2013/04/30 12:01, Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote: > Most architectures that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, have implementations for > both dma_alloc_attrs() and dma_free_attrs(). All achitectures that do > not define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA also have both of these definitions provided by > dma-mapping-broken.h. > > Provide a default definition for the archs that define CONFIG_HAVE_DMA=y, > but have no implementation for dma_{alloc,free}_attrs(). > > As I don't have hardware for any of these systems, the patches are only > compile-tested where I could (arm64, s390) and untested for the archs > where I couldn't find a readily available prebuilt cross-compiler (c6x, parisc). > > arch/arm64/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------ > arch/c6x/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ > arch/parisc/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 3 +++ > arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 17 +++++++++++------ > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > Since this series spans several architectures, what would be the best way to have this patch series merged? Should I resubmit each patch to the mailing list for each architecture separately? Thank you, Damian -- Damian Hobson-Garcia IGEL Co.,Ltd http://www.igel.co.jp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/