Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756197Ab3EVOjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 10:39:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36650 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754040Ab3EVOjI (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 10:39:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:39:24 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , Jens Axboe , "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing Message-ID: <20130522143923.GD19383@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <20130521235003.GE6985@mtj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130521235003.GE6985@mtj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 822 Lines: 24 On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:50:03AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hmmmmmm..... I'd normally apply this patch but block layer is just > growing multi-queue support and libata is likely to be converted to mq > in foreseeable future, so I'm a bit hesitant to make irq handling more > sophiscated right now. Would you be interested in looking into > converting libata to blk mq support? I'm pretty sure it'd yield far > better outcome if done properly. I am not committing, but will look into it, sure. > Thanks. > > -- > tejun -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/