Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757095Ab3EVUjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 16:39:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:62991 "EHLO mail-pd0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756268Ab3EVUjL (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2013 16:39:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 05:39:06 +0900 From: Tejun Heo To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PING^7 (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Corrections and customization of the SG_IO command whitelist (CVE-2012-4542)) Message-ID: <20130522203906.GC23845@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1360163761-8541-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <519C674A.50700@redhat.com> <20130522093249.GC3466@mtj.dyndns.org> <519C959A.3090100@redhat.com> <20130522100212.GE3466@mtj.dyndns.org> <519C9CBC.3050003@redhat.com> <20130522134134.GA15189@mtj.dyndns.org> <519CD234.40608@redhat.com> <20130522150335.GC2777@thunk.org> <519CE9FE.2030007@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519CE9FE.2030007@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1537 Lines: 32 Hey, On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:53:34PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I do listen to review feedback, but I also expect the other side to > listen to me, ask me what is not clear, and possess some knowledge of > the domain that he's reviewing patches for. All of which, quite > frankly, I have not seen in this case. Heh, nice one. As we've talked on RH mailing list, I don't doubt this has been a pretty bad experience for you but it also has been one of the worst review experiences for me too. It's on both of us that we do get frustrated easily and the discussions escalate very quickly; however, the biggest issue from my side is that it's very difficult to get a point across and even when the point seems to have been made what comes out of it is the mimum possible change around that point rather than wider interpretation and application of the point made. I'm not saying you don't listen to reviews at all but the reception definitely feels very low-gain. Anyways, at this point, the easiest way to make forward progress is completely separating out security fix from the rest along with the "count me out" knob, which should be able to cover most of the described use cases anyway. Let's please do further modifications to the filtering table as a separate step. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/