Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:04:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:04:47 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([140.239.227.29]:63398 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:04:47 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: New set of code snapshots for ext3-dxdir (kernel and userspace) From: tytso@mit.edu Phone: (781) 391-3464 Message-Id: Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 00:09:43 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1896 Lines: 42 On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:46:57PM -0700, Ryan Cumming wrote: > On September 29, 2002 01:16, Ryan Cumming wrote: > > Case 1: > > "Problem in HTREE directory inode 2 (/): bad block 3223649" This turned out to actually be an e2fsprogs bug, not a kernel bug. E2fsck was getting confused in some cases and interpreting a completely empty directory block as a HTREE interior node, and thus incorrectly flagging a valid HTREE directory as being corrupt. Your test case tends to generate the empty directory blocks because it does a large amounts of creates and deletes. Anyway, let's try to synchronize on a common set of kernel patches and userspace utilities, and see whether or not we've managed to get all of the problems fixed. For the kernel patches, I've created a patches against 2.4.19 and 2.5.39 that include the Andreas' kernel stack usage patch and Chrisl' empty directory entry split patch, which can be found here: http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/ext3-dxdir/patch-ext3-dxdir-2.4.19-3 http://thunk.org/tytso/linux/ext3-dxdir/patch-ext3-dxdir-2.5.39 In addition, I've released new e2fsprogs test release, which you can obtain from sourceforge: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-1.30-WIP-0930.tar.gz With these code base, and using a freshly created filesystem, I haven't been able to reproduce any problems using Ryan's fs-ream.c stress tester. So I'm pretty confident about its stability, although there might possibly be some race conditions lurking about under extreme load. Ryan, you care to give it a go, and see what you can find? - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/