Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756976Ab3EWHc1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 03:32:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:50528 "EHLO mail-wg0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998Ab3EWHc0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 03:32:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130516092308.GH19669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1368199049-2798-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1368199049-2798-9-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <20130514083148.GD15942@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> <5192217D.5030706@intel.com> <20130516092308.GH19669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:32:25 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch v6 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg From: Changlong Xie To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alex Shi , mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Changlong Xie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2680 Lines: 91 2013/5/16 Peter Zijlstra : > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:35:25PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > >> I tested all benchmarks on cover letter maintained, aim7, kbuild etc. >> with autogroup enabled. There is no clear performance change. >> But since the machine just run benchmark without anyother load, that >> doesn't enough. > > Back when we started with smp-fair cgroup muck someone wrote a test for it. I > _think_ it ended up in the LTP test-suite. > Hi Peter I just download the lastest ltp from http://sourceforge.net/projects/ltp/files/LTP%20Source/ltp-20130503/ and do cgroup benchmark tests on our SB-EP machine with 2S*8CORE*2SMT, 64G memory. Following is my testing procedures: 1. tar -xvf ltp-full-20130503.tar 2. cd ltp-full-20130503 3. ./configure prefix=/mnt/ltp && make -j32 && sudo make install 4. cd /mnt/ltp # create general testcase named cgroup_fj 5. echo -e "cgroup_fj run_cgroup_test_fj.sh" > runtest/cgroup # we only test cpuset/cpu/cpuacct cgroup benchmark cases, here is my cgroup_fj_testcases.sh 6. [changlox@lkp-sb03 bin]$ cat testcases/bin/cgroup_fj_testcases.sh stress 2 2 1 1 1 stress 4 2 1 1 1 stress 5 2 1 1 1 stress 2 1 1 1 2 stress 2 1 1 2 1 stress 2 1 1 2 2 stress 2 1 1 2 3 stress 2 1 2 1 1 stress 2 1 2 1 2 stress 2 1 2 1 3 stress 2 1 2 2 1 stress 2 1 2 2 2 stress 4 1 1 1 2 stress 4 1 2 1 1 stress 4 1 2 1 2 stress 4 1 2 1 3 stress 5 1 1 1 2 stress 5 1 1 2 1 stress 5 1 1 2 2 stress 5 1 1 2 3 stress 5 1 2 1 1 stress 5 1 2 1 2 stress 5 1 2 1 3 stress 5 1 2 2 1 stress 5 1 2 2 2 # run test 7. sudo ./runltp -p -l /tmp/cgroup.results.log -d /tmp -o /tmp/cgroup.log -f cgroup my test results: 3.10-rc1 patch1-7 patch1-8 duration=764 duration=754 duration=750 duration=764 duration=754 duration=751 duration=763 duration=755 duration=751 duration means the seconds of testing cost. Tested-by: Changlong Xie > Now I don't know if that's up-to-date enough to catch some of the cases we've > recently fixed (as in the past few years) so it might want to be updated. > > Paul, do you guys at Google have some nice test-cases for all this? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Best regards Changlox -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/