Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 03:34:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 03:34:32 -0400 Received: from [212.3.242.3] ([212.3.242.3]:51184 "HELO mail.vt4.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 03:34:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: DevilKin To: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.40 - and a feature freeze reminder Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 09:39:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210010939.53707.devilkin-lkml@blindguardian.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1156 Lines: 27 On Tuesday 01 October 2002 09:32, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And if it wasn't clear to the non-2.5-development people out there, yes > you _should_ also test this code out even before the freeze. The IDE layer > shouldn't be all that scary any more, and while there are still silly > things like trivially non-compiling setups etc, it's generally a good idea > to try things out as widely as possible before it's getting too late to > complain about things.. Basically: I would _love_ to test this kernel on my laptop here, but - unfortunately - i need the laptop for my work. Which means i need it to work. So how much chance IS there to trash the filesystems? I guess a lot of ppl like me are just waiting to test it out, but aren't willing to screw their systems over it... DK -- There's no easy quick way out, we're gonna have to live through our whole lives, win, lose, or draw. -- Walt Kelly - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/