Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759949Ab3EWXau (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 19:30:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:63295 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759783Ab3EWXat (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 May 2013 19:30:49 -0400 From: Stephen Mell To: Gu Zheng Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: move proc mount options out of pid_namespace Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 23:32:30 +0000 Message-ID: <2515335.Kvy7Q1OKc4@pegasus> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.9.3; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <519DED89.9000409@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <3342521.NtikuogILA@pegasus> <519DED89.9000409@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 689 Lines: 16 On Thursday, May 23, 2013 18:20:57 Gu Zheng wrote: > Here it'll create a new proc sb instance which holds the same context as the old ones > each time we mount proc though in the same PID namespace, won't it? I believe so. But this is the point, right? They won't be identical if different mount options are used, I don't think. > Here the pre-check seems needless. Is that new with my patch, or has it always been needless? Thanks, Stephen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/